Please login with your CCAMLR credentials
This data set provides a Climate Data Record (CDR) of sea ice concentration from passive microwave data. The CDR algorithm output is a rule-based combination of ice concentration estimates from two well-established algorithms: the NASA Team (NT) algorithm (Cavalieri et al. 1984) and the NASA Bootstrap (BT) algorithm (Comiso 1986). The CDR is a consistent, daily and monthly time series of sea ice concentrations from 25 October 1978 through the most recent processing for both the north and south polar regions. All data are on a 25 km x 25 km grid. Note: A near-real-time version of this data set also exists to fill the gap between the time that this data set is updated through to the present. The data set is called the Near-Real-Time NOAA/NSIDC Climate Data Record of Passive Microwave Sea Ice Concentration (https://nsidc.org/data/g10016).
Data downloaded from https://nsidc.org/data/g02202/versions/4
CCAMLR krill catch data are aggregated in 1000 square kilometer grid cells from fishing season 1989 onwards. The data can be filtered by fishing season and by summer (October to March) and Winter (April to September).
CCAMLR krill fishery trawling effort data are aggregated in 1000 square kilometer grid cells from fishing season 1989 onwards. The data are calculated as the sum of the number days during which a vessel conducted fishing activities in the grid cell. The data can be filtered by fishing season and by summer (October to March) and Winter (April to September).
CCAMLR krill catch per fishing day are calculated as the total catch in the 1000 square kilometer grid cell divided by number days during which a vessel conducted fishing activities in the grid cell. The aggregated data are provided from fishing season 1989 onwards and can be filtered by fishing season and by summer (October to March) and Winter (April to September).
The CCAMLR transshipment data are aggregated in 1000 square kilometer grid cells from fishing season 2015 onwards. The data include all tansshipments, including fuel, kril, and all other goods. The data can be filtered by fishing season.
CCAMLR toothfish catch data are aggregated in 1000 square kilometer grid cells from fishing season 1989 onwards. The data can be filtered by fishing season and month.
CCAMLR toothfish effort data (as kilometer of mainline set) are aggregated in 1000 square kilometer grid cells from fishing season 1989 onwards. The data can be filtered by fishing season and month.
CCAMLR toothfish kg catch per kilometer of mainline set data are aggregated in 1000 square kilometer grid cells from fishing season 1989 onwards. The data can be filtered by fishing season and month.
Positions where otoliths where collected are aggregated in 4000 square kilometer grid cells from fishing season 1996 onwards. The data can be filtered by fishing season and toothfish length.
The Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs (COMNAP) maintains a curated list of Antarctic facilities (stations, camps, etc.).
The COMNAP Antarctic Facilities is a comprehensive list of Antarctic facilities with a status of Open or Temporarily Closed.
The information included in the datasets was provided by each National Antarctic Program to COMNAP and is updated frequently.
COMNAP will release scheduled updates of this dataset. If you would like to be notified of changes, you can watch this repository.
COMNAP 2024 Version 3.5.0 downloaded from Polar Geospatial Center github repository pages at - https://github.com/PolarGeospatialCenter/comnap-antarctic-facilities/
In order to manage the commercial harvesting of Antarctic marine living resources in accordance with the ‘ecosystem approach’ that is embodied in Article II of the CAMLR Convention, the effects of fishing on harvested species (target species) as well dependent species and associated species need to be taken into account.
Dependent species are those species that feed on the target species or are impacted by the removal of the targets species from the food web. Associated species are typically those that are impacted directly by the action of fishing e.g. through by-catch or incidental mortality.
In order to provide information of the effects of fishing on dependent species, CCAMLR set up the CCAMLR Ecosystem Monitoring Program (CEMP) in 1989.
The indicator-species used in the CEMP program are:
Some krill-dependent species, such as crabeater seal (Lobodon carcinophagus), while considered likely to respond to changes in krill availability, have not been used in monitoring because they live in the pack-ice and so are not amenable to repeated/annual monitoring.
CCAMLR data. More information at https://www.ccamlr.org/science/ccamlr-ecosystem-monitoring-program-cemp
Data available from
https://github.com/ccamlr/data/tree/main/geographical_data/cemp
This layer provides penguin population counts from the MAPPPD (Mapping Application for Penguin Populations and Projected Dynamics) project. The project uses advanced modelling techniques to detect and count penguin colonies from remote sensing data. http://www.penguinmap.com/
Users may not copy or use material or data from MAPPPD for commercial use, except for use by the media, by Antarctic expedition operators or with the express written consent of Oceanites.
Version V_4_3
Layer downloaded from mapppd - https://www.penguinmap.com/mapppd
In February 2013, ACAP Latest News commenced posting a series of brief accounts describing breeding sites of ACAP-listed species. In considering what constitutes a breeding site, differences in conservation management procedures have been taken into account. However, with some exceptions, the usual defining unit has been an individual island. Extinct and translocation sites are also being covered. A breeding site account usually give information on the following:
The accounts are illustrated with photos usually depicting an overall view, habitat at the breeding site, a breeding colony and close-ups of individual birds.
More info available from https://www.acap.aq/resources/acap-breeding-sites
Data downloaded from https://data.acap.aq/search_sites.cfm
The CCAMLR Conservations Measures currently define the following types of Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems (VME) areas:
Data are availbale at https://vmeregistry.ccamlr.org/
The data provided are derived from those used to produce Figure 2 within Freer et al. 2023 (WG-EMM-2023/34). They represent acoustic-derived krill density estimates during the 2000 and 2019 Scotia Sea synoptic surveys. Specifically, we provide one dataset for the 2000 survey (all transects carried out at daytime) and two datasets for the 2019 survey (combined day+night transects, daytime only transects). Survey methodologies differed between years which is important when interpreting and comparing their observations. For a full comparison of synoptic survey methods, see Krafft et al. (2021) and Macaulay et al. (2019).
Acoustic data from both surveys were apportioned to krill and non-krill, using either a three-frequency variable window identification technique (2000) or a Swarms detection algorithm (2019), and then converted to wet weight density via a validated target strength model. Krafft et al. (2021) provide some evidence that the choice of discrimination method had only a minor effect on the estimated krill areal density and this on total biomass estimates. Estimates of krill biomass density (g m-2; hereafter referred to as krill biomass) were available at 1 nautical mile (1 nm; 1.85 km) intervals along each transect for both survey years. To minimize any effect of spatial heterogeneity in the krill data, we follow the method of Silk et al. (2016) to aggregate the 1nm data to an 80nm spatial resolution. To do so, individual 1nm reset values were averaged at 80nm bins for each unique stratum+transect category. Aggregated points consisting of less than ten 1nm reset values were excluded. Data for the 2019 survey were aggregated in two ways. Firstly, aggregating all transects conducted in both daytime and nighttime. Secondly, aggregating only daytime transects to be consistent with the 2000 survey. Absolute krill biomass (Figure 1) was transformed to relative biomass (Figure 2, i.e. biomass divided by total biomass such that the sum of the relative biomasses in each analysis was 1). Relative biomass values were rescaled to the range of 0-1 (Figure 3). For the purposes of this viewer, data points were subsequently cropped to retain only those data falling within CCAMLR subareas 48.1 and 48.2.